Lately, many banks have bucked the drop in the
Fed Fund rate and are paying decent rates. As I and others have written, some banks are doing it to attract and retain deposits to stay afloat, while other see it as an opportunity to gain market share.
In an
article on Bloomberg yesterday, several big bank CEOs criticized the practice.
“You have a whole raft of smaller banks out there, some of which are in difficulty, who are paying rates that are bordering on insanity,” James Wells, chief executive officer of SunTrust Banks Inc., said in a conference call with investors Nov. 13."
Ken Lewis, the CEO of Bank of America said that rival Wells Fargo ( a bank with uncompetitive rates) was a "rational pricer" intimating that high rate banks were not rational.
And one analyst even said that the Wachovia was purchased because the high rates it was offering were hurting other banks.
I think this is wrong. As
I wrote on BestCashCow:Bankers hate high deposit rates because they lower their profit. Of course Ken Lewis wants rates low. It makes his job easier and makes it easier to pay for all of the high rise buildings BofA operates in Charlotte, Boston, NY, and San Francisco. It makes it easier to pay for the Countrywide and Merrill Lynch acquisitions.
But our goal isn't to make it easier for bankers, it's to get the best return for our money so we can pay the rent, send our kids to college, and maybe retire. Consumers, people like you and me should also be working to maximize our return.
BankMan on the
Bank Deals Blog had a similar sentiment, writing:
The thing that I find unsettling about this Bloomberg article is how industry insiders appear to hold contempt against the banks offering the high rates.
I don't blame the bankers for wanting lower rates; it makes them more money. But I also think that as consumers, we have every right to put our money where it's going to earn us the highest return - and right now that's not Bank of America.